Cost of Living, Safety & Expat Guide (2026)

New Zealand

Malta
Based on our comparison, St. Julian's wins 7 out of 8 categories.Auckland wins 1 categories.
For digital nomads choosing between Auckland and St. Julian's, the answer depends on your priorities. Here's our analysis:
Best for Budget
St. Julian's
$1,977/mo
Best Internet
St. Julian's
130 Mbps
Best NomadIQ Score
St. Julian's
7.2/10
Our Recommendation: St. Julian's is the clear winner for digital nomads, offering both affordability and excellent nomad infrastructure.
When comparing Auckland and St. Julian's for digital nomads, several factors come into play.
Cost of Living: St. Julian's is the more budget-friendly option at $1,977/month versus Auckland's $2,064/month.
Internet & Remote Work: St. Julian's provides faster connectivity at 130 Mbps compared to Auckland's 110 Mbps.
Safety: With a safety score of 6.7/10, St. Julian's offers better security than Auckland (4.9/10).
Overall: St. Julian's's NomadIQ score of 7.2/10 gives it an edge for remote workers.
St. Julian's is 4% cheaper than Auckland.
St. Julian's has a higher safety score (6.7/10) compared to Auckland (4.9/10).
4.9/10
Auckland
6.7/10
St. Julian's
For remote workers, internet speed is crucial. St. Julian's offers faster internet at 130 Mbps vs 110 Mbps.
110 Mbps
Auckland
130 Mbps
St. Julian's
Based on our analysis, St. Julian's edges out as the better choice for expats, winning 7 of 8 comparison factors.
Auckland: Best for those prioritizing amenities
St. Julian's: Best for budget-conscious expats
We use cookies, analytics tools and advertising technologies, including Google Analytics, Meta Pixel and other advertising/analytics cookies, to improve our site, measure performance and personalise your experience. You can accept or decline at any time.